It depends But to help you better guesstimate how much storage you’ll save with View Composer, let’s take a look at the actual storage savings in my home lab. Keep in mind that VMware View isn’t just something I’m playing around with. There are currenlty 5 other VMware Systems Engineers using my lab on a regular basis. And I use VMware View to give each lab user a dedicated, persistent desktop VM which they connect to remotely via the View Client. And from their dedicated lab desktop, they have full access to the lab environment I’ve built. So, while my home lab environment may be small and by no means a production enviornment, I’m still using VMware View as a “production” application, so to speak. It’s the one application in my lab that needs to be up, and it gets heavily used.
Let’s first look at how much storage my virtual desktop infrastructure would require without the use of View Composer. As I said, each lab user has a dedicated desktop, which has a 12G partition for OS and a 4G partition for user data. Also, each desktop has 1G of memory with zero memory reservation, which transltates into a 1G swap file. That’s a total of 17G per user. Right now there are 5 other remote users, plus I have a desktop for myself. And I have 2 desktops on standby for new users (so they don’t have to wait for a new VM to be built upon first login). So, that brings the total virtual desktops to 8. Therefore the total storage requirement for virtual desktops in my lab without View Composer would be 136G (17G * 8 desktops).
Now let’s look and see how much space is actually being used in my lab. Here’s a cut and paste showing the disk usage of the volume holding the desktop VMs …
[root@cincylab-esx1 cincylab-vol1]# du -sh *
The grand total here is 33.2G, which is about a 75% reduction in storage. Not bad. The storage reduction is achieved through two technologies, Linked Clones and Thin Disks.
In my environment, the virtual disks for the desktops are located in the labuser-0* directories (this is done automatically for me during the deployment process). These virtual disks are not thick, monolithic disks like they used to be in the previous version. Rather, they are delta disks, which only store data differences between the desktop OS and the OS of the parent VM. In the cut and paste above, notice the 13G parent_desktop? That’s my starting point and contains my golden image. That direcotry also contains a snapshot, which I took when I was ready to being deploying desktops. The replica-774c678b-e6b5-495a-b8ff- VM is derived from this snapshot and ultimately serves as the parent VM (for now, this can change over time) of the labuser-0* desktops. Linked Clones have other benefits too, especially around patching and updateing. But that’s a topic for a later post.
Remember how I said the users need a 17G? (12G for OS, 4G for user data and 1G for swap) But did you notice that the parent_desktop directory is only 13G in size (12G OS plus 1G swap)? From the administration guide “Thin provisioned disks (thin disks) are used by the linked clones to store user data, and are not linked to the Parent VM.” So I didn’t need to include the user partition in the parent VM. The user partition is handled for me when a desktop is deployed and included with each of the user desktops. User data disks are persistent and they are thin, meaning they occupy no more space than the data requires. In my environment, looking at the virtual disks for labuser-03:
[root@cincylab-esx1 labuser-03]# ls -lah
drwxr-xr-x 1 root root 1.8K Dec 27 09:23 .
drwxr-xr-t 1 root root 3.7K Jan 5 06:10 ..
-rw——- 1 root root 1.0G Dec 27 09:23 labuser-03-a2263868.vswp
-rw——- 1 root root 8.5K Dec 27 09:23 labuser-03.nvram
-rw——- 1 root root 4.0G Jan 5 08:07 labuser-03-vdm-user-disk-D-flat.vmdk
-rw——- 1 root root 443 Dec 27 09:24 labuser-03-vdm-user-disk-D.vmdk
-rw——- 1 root root 75 Dec 27 09:21 labuser-03.vmsd
-rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 3.9K Dec 31 06:58 labuser-03.vmx
-rw——- 1 root root 265 Dec 31 06:58 labuser-03.vmxf
-rw——- 1 root root 2.5G Jan 5 08:07 replica-774c678b-e6b5-495a-b8ff–cl1-delta.vmdk
-rw——- 1 root root 379 Dec 27 09:24 replica-774c678b-e6b5-495a-b8ff–cl1.vmdk
-rw-r–r– 1 root root 62K Dec 27 09:21 vmware-1.log
-rw-r–r– 1 root root 36K Jan 5 06:21 vmware.log
Look at the size of labuser-03-vdm-user-disk-D-flat.vmdk, see how the file system “thinks” it’s 4.0G? It’s really not. A closer look at disk usage reaveals:
[root@cincylab-esx1 labuser-03]# du -sh *
It’s actually only taking up 43M, not 4G. And a quick look inside the VM confirms it too “thinks” it has 4G:
So that’s my real world example of how much storage I’m saving with View Composer. How much will you save? Again, it depends There are things that I haven’t discussed in this post (e.g. desktop refresh, desktop recomposition and desktop rebalance), which will also affect storage savings. Also, using ThinApp’d applications that live on a file share (as opposed to putting them in the OS) could have a big positive impact on storage savings. In my lab, with only linked clones and thin disks, I’m getting a 75% reduction. With a little more effort and planning on my part, I’m confident I could achieve 85% or better.