<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: View 3.1 USB Redirection Improvements</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.virtualinsanity.com/index.php/2009/05/28/view-31-usb-redirection-improvements/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.virtualinsanity.com/index.php/2009/05/28/view-31-usb-redirection-improvements/</link>
	<description>a technology blog with a focus on virtualization and cloud computing</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 13:17:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rick Westrate</title>
		<link>http://www.virtualinsanity.com/index.php/2009/05/28/view-31-usb-redirection-improvements/comment-page-1/#comment-1925</link>
		<dc:creator>Rick Westrate</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Jun 2009 13:21:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.virtualinsanity.com/?p=464#comment-1925</guid>
		<description>If I&#039;m not mistaken, Flash throttling occurs server side and is not currently broken out into a separate RDP virtual channel.  3.1 does not have true multimedia redirection for Flash yet.  I know for some of the other multimedia codecs there is a true breakout of the data that is sent down the MMR virtual channel to the endpoint where it then uses the client-side CPU to process and display the multimedia.  I will double check on the Flash virtual channel though as this is the first I had heard of it...and my sources are usually pretty good!  :-)
That said, all the MMR stuff is still within a RDP virtual channel so from a network perspective you would only see RDP traffic.  The USB redirection is truly a complete breakout of the USB traffic from RDP into its own unique TCP stream on port 32111.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If I&#8217;m not mistaken, Flash throttling occurs server side and is not currently broken out into a separate RDP virtual channel.  3.1 does not have true multimedia redirection for Flash yet.  I know for some of the other multimedia codecs there is a true breakout of the data that is sent down the MMR virtual channel to the endpoint where it then uses the client-side CPU to process and display the multimedia.  I will double check on the Flash virtual channel though as this is the first I had heard of it&#8230;and my sources are usually pretty good!  <img src='http://www.virtualinsanity.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /><br />
That said, all the MMR stuff is still within a RDP virtual channel so from a network perspective you would only see RDP traffic.  The USB redirection is truly a complete breakout of the USB traffic from RDP into its own unique TCP stream on port 32111.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ccostan</title>
		<link>http://www.virtualinsanity.com/index.php/2009/05/28/view-31-usb-redirection-improvements/comment-page-1/#comment-2002</link>
		<dc:creator>ccostan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2009 19:14:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.virtualinsanity.com/?p=464#comment-2002</guid>
		<description>Interesting, I believe they are also doing this with the new FLASH throttling improvements.  Seperating it out of the main stream and into it&#039;s own channel.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Carlo.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting, I believe they are also doing this with the new FLASH throttling improvements.  Seperating it out of the main stream and into it&#39;s own channel.</p>
<p>Carlo.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ccostan</title>
		<link>http://www.virtualinsanity.com/index.php/2009/05/28/view-31-usb-redirection-improvements/comment-page-1/#comment-1923</link>
		<dc:creator>ccostan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2009 12:14:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.virtualinsanity.com/?p=464#comment-1923</guid>
		<description>Interesting, I believe they are also doing this with the new FLASH throttling improvements.  Seperating it out of the main stream and into it&#039;s own channel.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Carlo.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting, I believe they are also doing this with the new FLASH throttling improvements.  Seperating it out of the main stream and into it&#39;s own channel.</p>
<p>Carlo.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

