<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: VMware pvSCSI – When and when not to use it</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.virtualinsanity.com/index.php/2010/02/05/vmware-pvscsi-when-and-when-not-to-use-it/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.virtualinsanity.com/index.php/2010/02/05/vmware-pvscsi-when-and-when-not-to-use-it/</link>
	<description>a technology blog with a focus on virtualization and cloud computing</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 13:17:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Section_32</title>
		<link>http://www.virtualinsanity.com/index.php/2010/02/05/vmware-pvscsi-when-and-when-not-to-use-it/comment-page-1/#comment-2608</link>
		<dc:creator>Section_32</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jan 2012 15:22:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.virtualinsanity.com/index.php/2010/02/05/vmware-pvscsi-when-and-when-not-to-use-it/#comment-2608</guid>
		<description>HI
Now a year has moved on, do we know if 4.0 U4 has the same fix as 4.1?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>HI<br />
Now a year has moved on, do we know if 4.0 U4 has the same fix as 4.1?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt Ray</title>
		<link>http://www.virtualinsanity.com/index.php/2010/02/05/vmware-pvscsi-when-and-when-not-to-use-it/comment-page-1/#comment-2428</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt Ray</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Nov 2010 15:52:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.virtualinsanity.com/index.php/2010/02/05/vmware-pvscsi-when-and-when-not-to-use-it/#comment-2428</guid>
		<description>Hi, note that this issue is now fixed in vSphere 4.1, so you can use PVSCSI for any workload.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi, note that this issue is now fixed in vSphere 4.1, so you can use PVSCSI for any workload.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: scottsauer</title>
		<link>http://www.virtualinsanity.com/index.php/2010/02/05/vmware-pvscsi-when-and-when-not-to-use-it/comment-page-1/#comment-2031</link>
		<dc:creator>scottsauer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Feb 2010 18:37:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.virtualinsanity.com/index.php/2010/02/05/vmware-pvscsi-when-and-when-not-to-use-it/#comment-2031</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the link Didier!  Yes this breaks the traditional expected IOPS for any virtual machine, I would say once you get into several hundred iops per vm, you need to shift your thinking about your storage configuration.  You could easily begin to impact your other virtual machines that share that same data store.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the link Didier!  Yes this breaks the traditional expected IOPS for any virtual machine, I would say once you get into several hundred iops per vm, you need to shift your thinking about your storage configuration.  You could easily begin to impact your other virtual machines that share that same data store.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PiroNet</title>
		<link>http://www.virtualinsanity.com/index.php/2010/02/05/vmware-pvscsi-when-and-when-not-to-use-it/comment-page-1/#comment-2030</link>
		<dc:creator>PiroNet</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Feb 2010 14:39:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.virtualinsanity.com/index.php/2010/02/05/vmware-pvscsi-when-and-when-not-to-use-it/#comment-2030</guid>
		<description>Hi Scott,&lt;br&gt;2000 IOPS it&#039;s definitely a lot for a single VM!&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&gt;Consider this, a standard fiber channel 10,000 RPM drive averages around 125 IOPS per disk.&lt;br&gt;Here is a formula to easily calculate the IOPS of any disk: 1/(average latency in ms + average seek time for read or write in ms)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;More at &lt;a href=&quot;http://deinoscloud.wordpress.com/2009/09/11/understanding-disk-iops/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://deinoscloud.wordpress.com/2009/09/11/und...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Cheers,&lt;br&gt;Didier</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Scott,<br />2000 IOPS it&#39;s definitely a lot for a single VM!</p>
<p>&gt;Consider this, a standard fiber channel 10,000 RPM drive averages around 125 IOPS per disk.<br />Here is a formula to easily calculate the IOPS of any disk: 1/(average latency in ms + average seek time for read or write in ms)</p>
<p>More at <a href="http://deinoscloud.wordpress.com/2009/09/11/understanding-disk-iops/" rel="nofollow" onclick="pageTracker._trackPageview('/outgoing/deinoscloud.wordpress.com/2009/09/11/understanding-disk-iops/?referer=');">http://deinoscloud.wordpress.com/2009/09/11/und&#8230;</a></p>
<p>Cheers,<br />Didier</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Most Tweeted Articles by Virtualization Experts: MrTweet</title>
		<link>http://www.virtualinsanity.com/index.php/2010/02/05/vmware-pvscsi-when-and-when-not-to-use-it/comment-page-1/#comment-2025</link>
		<dc:creator>Most Tweeted Articles by Virtualization Experts: MrTweet</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Feb 2010 11:05:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.virtualinsanity.com/index.php/2010/02/05/vmware-pvscsi-when-and-when-not-to-use-it/#comment-2025</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Your article was most tweeted by Virtualization experts in the Twitterverse...&lt;/strong&gt;

Come see other top popular articles surfaced by Virtualization experts!...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Your article was most tweeted by Virtualization experts in the Twitterverse&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>Come see other top popular articles surfaced by Virtualization experts!&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim Oudin</title>
		<link>http://www.virtualinsanity.com/index.php/2010/02/05/vmware-pvscsi-when-and-when-not-to-use-it/comment-page-1/#comment-2023</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim Oudin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Feb 2010 05:50:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.virtualinsanity.com/index.php/2010/02/05/vmware-pvscsi-when-and-when-not-to-use-it/#comment-2023</guid>
		<description>Great, and quick, follow up Scott!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great, and quick, follow up Scott!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: uberVU - social comments</title>
		<link>http://www.virtualinsanity.com/index.php/2010/02/05/vmware-pvscsi-when-and-when-not-to-use-it/comment-page-1/#comment-2022</link>
		<dc:creator>uberVU - social comments</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Feb 2010 00:37:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.virtualinsanity.com/index.php/2010/02/05/vmware-pvscsi-when-and-when-not-to-use-it/#comment-2022</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Social comments and analytics for this post...&lt;/strong&gt;

This post was mentioned on Twitter by ssauer: New blog post: VMware pvSCSI when and when not to use it http://bit.ly/cUxbug #vSphere #VMware #pvscsi...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Social comments and analytics for this post&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>This post was mentioned on Twitter by ssauer: New blog post: VMware pvSCSI when and when not to use it <a href="http://bit.ly/cUxbug" rel="nofollow" onclick="pageTracker._trackPageview('/outgoing/bit.ly/cUxbug?referer=');">http://bit.ly/cUxbug</a> #vSphere #VMware #pvscsi&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

